Men are not a new sensation
I've done pretty well, I think
But this half-pint imitation
Put me on the blink
--Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered,
Lornz and Hart
[You're ugly] and you're boring,
and you're totally ordinary
--American Beauty (1999)
Leaders proclaim a government
To last forever,
Then walls collapse and refugees
Come pouring over
--Farmer Sowing,
Adam Kirsch
_________________________
Killings
like the recent one in San Bernadino are often called “senseless”,
“horrendous” and always, “terrorism” -- but is it so?
Even assuming that it was those things, was it “spectacular”?
The
San Bernadino attack feels like any of the other tawdry mass shootings
conducted by criminally-insane, marginalized shooters. Sad to say, but as the character Ricky Fitts says in the film
American Beauty, it was "totally ordinary," in the state of our new normal.
Regardless
of what we call the event, it was a cold and calculated murder executed
within the social circle of the shooters. It is possible it was an act
of revenge by
Syed Rizwan Farook against co-workers who criticized
his Muslim
religion. It was a terror-filled event, but Terrorism and terror are
distinct terms. And since all terrorism is criminal activity, does it
matter that these
killers pledged allegiance to the Islamic State? If so, In what purview
does it matter? Most assuredly, the killings were not an act of war.
There
is a sense that this couple camouflaged their personal animosities and
called it a “jihad”. This can be inferred because of the location they
chose: instead of entering a federal building or a military compound,
they attacked Farouk's co-workers at a Christmas party.
Contrast
this action to the recent Paris attacks which were clear acts of
terrorism as they affected an audience beyond the killing (i.e., the
French government). Paris gained the Islamic State diplomatic
recognition as an army, based on the reactions of the French government.
In
comparison, there is no discernible evidence that the U.S. shooters
were trained in soldierly skills or that they possessed any tradecraft
or experience in the world of “sleeper agents”.
Their bombs could not bomb (said in our best Inspector Clouseau.) Only unsophisticated bombers use pipe bombs, anyway. Only idiots would use metal, screw-on pipes.
Their home-made hand grenades were as bad as those of bombers
manqué Reid and
Abdulmutallab (the
shoe and
underwear
bombers [not], respectively.) If they were tied in to the World Terror
Network, their behavior violates the rule that Terror groups learn,
cross-fertilize and don’t repeat the same stupid mistakes.
They
used semi-auto rifles with 30-round magazines, with back-up pistols.
When they entered the crime scene they had 60 rounds locked and loaded,
yet achieved only 14 kills (my sympathy to those and their families)
because they did not seal the avenues of approach. A professional would
not have overlooked this fact.
Further, why did the shooters use M16 clones, versus AK47 semi automatics available in any gun shop in the United States?
The AK47 is the terrorist weapon of choice in close quarters fighting, so the AK's absence would indicate that these two were not educated in a terrorist training camp.
Their escape route was not effective, either (
echoing the mistake made by the Boston bombers.)
During the final shootout they were reported to have had a large supply
of rifle ammunition, but in the news photos, the ammo appeared in
stripper clips, and not loaded into magazines. This is amateur behavior,
as a trained fighter would have all ammo loaded into magazines, ready
for the fight. (A soldier’s basic load is 140 rounds, in magazines.)
San
Bernadino was another grotesque mass murder, of no consequence,
committed by two bumbling idiots, two disturbed, vacuous and soulless
individuals.
If this is the best that Islamic State can
array against us, then they are of little consequence to the U.S. This
is not a “bring it on” moment; this is a fact.
[cross-posted
@ RangerAgainstWar.]
