75 years ago on 16 September 1941 Tehran was occupied by a joint Anglo-Soviet force.
The
stated reason was to rid the country of German nationals and German influence even
though Iran had declared neutrality in WW2. Perhaps there
was some minor Axis sentiment in Iran.
But it was rather more anti-Russian and anti-British than pro-German because
Russia and England had played their Great Game in Iran since the early 19th
century alienating most Iranians.
But
the two major reasons for the occupation were different. One was to open up the Trans-Iranian Railway
to provide supplies and armaments for the Soviet war effort. A land route to Russia was critical with the
limited lift capacity of, and danger to, the Arctic Convoys to Archangelsk and Murmansk. Reason two, which was crucial for the Brits
was to secure the Iranian oilfields for the British war effort and for the stockholders of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. In addition to the oilfields, the Abadan
refinery was the largest oil refinery in the world at that time.
The invasion into Iranian territory started on 25 August.
The Iranian Army in 1941 was basically a counter-insurgency
force. Their only combat experience was subduing internal
insurrections by ethnic Kurds, Azeris, Turkmen, Lurs, Baluchis, Gilaks, Arabs, and
Qashqais. Or the army was busy suppressing tribal unrest due to Reza Shah’s attempts at de-tribalization and urbanization of nomads. The Army had no experience against a modern
military force. They were trying to
go through a period of modernization promoted by a group of young western
educated junior officers. But the high
command was useless in that effort as they were mostly
old cronies of the Shah from his days in the Persian Cossack Brigade. Sycophants and yes men, they were more interested in building up
their personal wealth than building up the army. The Shah himself as a former gunnery sergeant
was somewhat of a micromanager, which lead to a lack of resourcefulness in much of the officer
corps. Plus there was the fact that
horse cavalry and peasant conscripts did not do too well against tanks and artillery.
So the Shah sued for peace three days later on August
28th. But the Brits and
Soviets ignored him until they jointly seized Tehran on the 16th and
forced him to abdicate his throne and replaced him with his son as their
puppet.
The Soviets invaded with three armies and 1000 T-26 tanks. In the west the 44th and 47th Armies of the Transcaucasus Front pushed in from the Azerbaijan SSR. And in the east
they invaded from Turkmenistan with the 53rd Independent Central
Asian Army. There are
not a lot of English sources available on the Soviet aspect of the invasion. The only one I have read is Professor KavehFarroqh’s book “Iran at War”. It is
amazing to me that the Soviets had the wherewithal to conduct this operation
because in the first week of August alone at the Battle of Smolensk they had
lost over 750,000 men, 3000 tanks & self-propelled guns, and 900 aircraft.
The British, using mostly Indian troops, also split
their advance. In southern Iran in
Khuzestan the 8th Indian Infantry Division sent the 24th
Brigade in an amphibious assault across the Shatt-al-Arab to take the Abadan
refinery. Abadan reportedly had to be
taken against fierce resistance as some Iranians reportedly fought to the last
man. Another amphibious landing was made at
Bandar Shahpur (now known as Bandar-e Emam Khomeyni). Bandar Shahpur was critical as it was the
terminus of the Trans-Iranian Railway needed for supplying the Soviets with war
materiel. The rest of the division in
Basra forged east to take Khorramshar.
The central Iran advance was led by General
Slim (later of Fourteenth Army fame in Burma). I believe that is Slim on the left sitting next to General Novikov of the 47th Army. Slim led a scratch task force consisting of one brigade from his own 10th
Indian Infantry Division, plus the 2nd Indian Armored Brigade, and the
4th British Cavalry Brigade.
They crossed into Iran from Khanaquin, Iraq. They traversed the Zagros mountains at Pai Tak
pass driving to the Naft Shahr oilfields and Kermanshah with a lot less
opposition than the 8th had in the south. General Slim called it an ‘opera bouffe’. The wikipedia page claims General Slim “directed
the battle remotely via radio from India”. Not
so according to author and Gurkha officer John Masters who is quoted as saying
that Slim in his khaki colored station wagon did a personal recon of the Pai
Tak Pass well in front of the Task Force spearhead.
The aftermath: The US Army Transportation Corps soon came in to run the railroad and provided 3000 additional freight cars and 148 locomotives. They built wharves and improved roads and airfields. American contractors came in and established assembly plants for aircraft, trucks and other factories. So the
Soviets got 5 million tons of armaments and supplies by rail and road thru that ‘Persian Corridor' plus 4800+ combat aircraft flown in and 180,000 trucks driven in. That materiel was of significant importance (if not decisive) to the Battle of Stalingrad. By the way, the 53rd
Army later fought at the Battle of Kursk and after the war participated in the
Soviet occupation of Manchuria. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company got their oil
and eventually were renamed British Petroleum of Deepwater Horizon infamy
and before that the Prudhoe Bay Oil Spill and the Texas City Refinery Disaster. Reza Shah died in exile in South Africa. Reza Shah’s son got the throne for 38 years
until he too was deposed in 1979. General Slim went on to become a Field Marshal, a viscount, Governor General of Australia, and was voted Britain's Greatest General by UK WW2 veterans. Rear
Admiral Gholam-ali Bayandor
who led
both the land and sea defenses against the Brits in Khuzestan and was killed
there is today still commemorated as
a hero and martyr by the Iranian military.
Thanks Mike, I didn't know about this. Strange how either the histories of WWII that I read didn't mention it, or if they did, I completely glossed over it.
ReplyDeleteAlso, another reason why foreigners seem to be suspicious about our obviously good intentions.
AEL -
ReplyDeleteThe Americans left almost immediately after VE Day in May 45. And BTW while they were there, they gave Lend-Lease to Iran. The Brits left six months after VE Day.
The Soviets stayed much longer and sponsored revolts by establishing an Azeri Republic in northwestern Iran and a Kurdish Republic the west. They also promoted and backed a Communist Party in Iran. Which is why I wonder how long this seeming Russian/Iranian alliance in Syria will last?
Yes, the Soviets were doing their usual thing, fostering unrest and trying to redraw the map to their satisfaction.
ReplyDeleteThe West did withdraw troops quickly. Of course, saying that the British and Americans "left" overlooks all the shenanigans about oil companies, audits and coups a few years later.
As for the "alliance" lasts, the Iranians and Russians cooperating does not arise from deep cultural affinity. Rather, it would be purely transaction based. The longevity of the cooperation will depend on how long both profit from it. Thus, the Americans can easily peel off one of the parties, as long as they make a "better" offer.
Somehow, given the current politics, I suspect that the Russians and Iranians will be "friends" for quite a while.
Ael
ReplyDeleteI believe you are right regarding a long friendship. They are both profiting from trade. Between them there is a mutual antagonism to Sunni jihadism. Plus the maskirovka insinuation that America is secretly behind the jihadists binds Tehran even closer to Moscow.
On second thought, I think there is a great deal of suspicion there, which is probably a good thing between allies. I am sure that most if not all of the Ayatollahs still remember that in the Iran/Iraq War that the Russkies were resupplying Sadaam with weapons and ammo. The senior IRGC leaders surely are mistrustful of Russia.
ReplyDeleteAnother thought or two - I note that the Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif attended prep school in San Francisco and then got both a BA and an MA in International Relations from San Francisco State University. He later got another MA plus a PhD from the University of Denver.
ReplyDeleteBut then that could change in a heartbeat if the conservatives take power in Iran. In politics they are just as bipolar as we Americans are. And the Minister of Defense is a former commander in the Revolutionary Guards so not all are reformers in the current administration.
Yes indeed. Iran is a large country with a full range of cultural and political factions. Elections there do have (at least some) consequences and, as always, internal politics rule!
ReplyDelete